headermask image

header image

Why Is Greenland Covered In Ice? Changes In Carbon Dioxide Levels Explain Transition

ScienceDaily (Aug. 28, 2008) — There have been many reports in the media about the effects of global warming on the Greenland ice-sheet, but there is still great uncertainty as to why there is an ice-sheet there at all.


Reporting today (28 August) in the journal Nature, scientists at the University of Bristol and the University of Leeds show that only changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide are able to explain the transition from the mostly ice-free Greenland of three million years ago, to the ice-covered Greenland of today.

Understanding why the ice formed on Greenland three million years ago will help understand the possible response of the ice sheet to future climate change.

Dr Dan Lunt from the University of Bristol and funded by the British Antarctic Survey, explained: “Evidence shows that around three million years ago there was an increase in the amount of rock and debris deposited on the ocean floor around Greenland. These rocks could not have got there until icebergs started to form and could transport them, indicating that large amounts of ice on Greenland only began to form about three million years ago.

“Prior to that, Greenland was largely ice-free and probably covered in grass and forest. Furthermore, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were relatively high. So the question we wanted to answer was why did Greenland become covered in an ice-sheet?”

There are several competing theories, ranging from changes in ocean circulation, the increasing height of the Rocky Mountains, changes in the Earth’s orbit, and natural changes in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Using state-of-the-art computer climate and ice-sheet models, Lunt and colleagues decided to test which, if any, of these theories was the most credible. Keep Reading

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

One Comment

  1. While there is still much science we don’t fully understand, we mustn’t dwell on that but on action in the context of what we do understand – that we, humanity, is assisting in climate change in a way that it undesirable for many civilizations on the planet. As well as the excellent Stern and Garnaut reports that I recommend for good reading there is also a new-ish website at http://www.climatechangetriage.net that should be a good vehicle to involve us, the taxpayers and voters, in how we can best use our constrained resources (especialy money and time)

    1. Chris H. on August 29th, 2008 at 8:53 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree